HomeArticle

Behind the continuous price adjustments of fuel-powered vehicles, how can the industry achieve a smooth transition during its transformation?

新能源观察家2026-07-03 12:01
In recent years, profound changes have taken place in the structure of the automobile market, and new energy vehicles have been rapidly popularized.

In recent years, the structure of the automotive market has undergone profound changes. New energy vehicle models have been rapidly popularized, and the market share of fuel - powered vehicles has continued to shrink. The terminal discounts of major joint - venture and luxury fuel - powered vehicle models have been continuously expanding. Many mid - to high - end fuel - powered SUVs that used to be sold at a premium are now seeing a significant drop in the terminal transaction price of new cars. The price gap has sparked extensive discussions in the industry and among consumers. The continuous decline in the price of fuel - powered vehicles is not a short - term promotional activity of a single model, but an industry trend formed by the superposition of multiple factors such as electrification transformation, vehicle usage cost, product experience, and inventory policy. This article objectively sorts out the deep - seated causes behind the price cuts of fuel - powered vehicles, rationally analyzes the market situation, and gently urges automakers to balance the rhythm of inventory clearance, product iteration, and long - term brand value, so as to promote the smooth transition of the industry in power switching.

1. Intuitive Market Changes: Significant Adjustment of Terminal Prices of Multiple Categories of Fuel - Powered Vehicles

A few years ago, when several imported luxury mid - sized SUVs were launched, they were extremely popular in the market, and customers had to pay an additional premium to buy them. The full - set landing cost was close to 900,000 yuan. In just three years, the official price of the new models on the same platform has been significantly reduced, and the terminal price of the bare car is less than 200,000 yuan. This huge price gap intuitively reflects the change in the pricing logic of the fuel - powered vehicle market. It's not just a single luxury model; the entire fuel - powered vehicle segment is simultaneously increasing discounts.

There are generally discounts of tens of thousands of yuan at the terminal for large and medium - sized sedans and mid - sized SUVs of traditional luxury brands. The discount rates of many mainstream joint - venture Class B sedans and compact family cars have been continuously rising, and the terminal price of entry - level fuel - powered vehicles for daily use has dropped to the range of 60,000 yuan. While the prices are being significantly cut, the market demand for fuel - powered vehicles has not recovered simultaneously. The industry's retail data has continued to weaken, with the year - on - year decline in the monthly retail scale approaching 40%, and the market share has shrunk to just over 30%. In the monthly passenger car sales list, new energy vehicle models occupy the vast majority of the positions, and the number of fuel - powered vehicles on the list is very small. The trend of market focus shift is very clear.

The inventory policy is the direct driving force for the short - term price cuts. According to the time nodes of emission regulations, a large number of fuel - powered vehicles that meet the old standards need to be invoiced and registered for license plates within the specified time limit. Otherwise, they cannot be normally used on the road. In order to clear the backlogged inventory, dealers can only attract customers by offering significant discounts, which further depresses the terminal transaction price. However, inventory clearance is only a superficial cause. The deeper structural contradictions are the core reasons for the continuous loosening of the price system of fuel - powered vehicles.

2. Multiple Structural Factors Jointly Promote the Adjustment of the Fuel - Powered Vehicle Market

1. New Energy Products Have Comprehensive Differentiated Advantages in Product Experience

Currently, mainstream - priced new energy vehicle models have obvious advantages over fuel - powered vehicles of the same class in terms of hardware configuration and driving experience. With the same budget, pure - electric vehicle models are generally standard - equipped with high - level intelligent driving, multi - channel seat ventilation/heating/massage, large - sized intelligent cockpits, high - definition panoramic images and other configurations. However, many fuel - powered vehicle models require additional payment to select comfort features. The in - vehicle infotainment system runs sluggishly, has slow iteration and update, and lacks the ability of remote upgrade.

The gap in chassis hardware is also prominent. Many new energy vehicles priced at over 100,000 yuan are equipped with double wishbone, aluminum alloy suspension, and four - wheel drive power structures. Their acceleration performance and driving quietness far exceed those of fuel - powered vehicles of the same class. Traditional fuel - powered vehicles mostly use basic suspension structures, and they have inherent shortcomings in power smoothness and noise control. For ordinary family users, with the same budget, they can buy new energy vehicle models with higher configuration and more comfortable experience, so their consumption choices naturally tilt.

2. There is a Huge Gap in Long - Term Vehicle Usage Costs

The long - term difference in the usage costs of electricity and fuel is a key factor affecting consumers' car - buying decisions. The electricity price for daily household charging is low, and the electricity cost per 100 kilometers is only more than ten yuan. The fuel cost per 100 kilometers of fuel - powered vehicles is generally 50 to 60 yuan. Over a long - term usage period of five to ten years, the difference between the two can reach tens of thousands of yuan. At the same time, the maintenance items of pure - electric vehicle models are simple, only requiring the replacement of small parts such as air - conditioning filters. Fuel - powered vehicles need to have their engine oil, transmission oil, and spark plugs replaced regularly, with higher maintenance frequency and expenses.

Combined with the difference in vehicle depreciation rates, the three - year depreciation rate of fuel - powered vehicles has been declining year by year, and the residual value of most joint - venture models after three years is less than 50%. Although new energy vehicle models are updated rapidly, the capital loss caused by the depreciation of low - priced entry - level models is lower. After consumers calculate the total cost of the entire vehicle usage life cycle, the comprehensive cost - performance advantage of new energy vehicle models continues to expand, and the attractiveness of fuel - powered vehicles continues to weaken.

3. The Market Demand Structure Has Undergone an Irreversible Change

The supporting infrastructure for new energy vehicles in China has been continuously improved. Private charging piles and high - speed super - charging networks have been widely deployed, and the cruising range has been continuously increased. The once - prevalent range anxiety has been greatly alleviated. In most daily scenarios such as household use, commuting, and short - distance outings, pure - electric and extended - range vehicle models can fully meet the needs, and consumers no longer have to rely on fuel - powered vehicles to solve their travel problems.

At the same time, the supply structure of new cars has clearly tilted. Among the new models launched this year, pure - electric and hybrid vehicle models account for more than 90%, and the launch of new fuel - powered vehicles is extremely rare. Automakers' R & D resources and marketing resources have been fully tilted towards new energy, the iteration of fuel - powered vehicle product lines has slowed down, and the product competitiveness is difficult to continuously improve, which further exacerbates the decline in demand.

4. Inventory Pressure Forces Dealers to Continuously Offer Discounts

Due to the combination of emission policy nodes and the decline in demand, the inventory coefficient of dealers far exceeds the healthy warning line. A large number of fuel - powered vehicles are backlogged, occupying a large amount of funds, and the pressure on capital turnover is huge. In order to quickly recover cash flow, stores can only continuously increase the discount rate, forming a cycle of "the more the price is cut, the stronger the wait - and - see sentiment": consumers anticipate greater discounts in the future and hold off on buying, which further reduces sales. Dealers have to continue to lower the quotes, and the price system of fuel - powered vehicles continues to be under pressure.

Many consumers have developed a "wait - and - see" mentality. They generally believe that buying a fuel - powered vehicle now will lead to rapid depreciation. The anxiety about vehicle depreciation caused by the short - term significant price cuts further suppresses the current car - buying willingness, forming a negative market cycle.

3. Multiple Negative Industry Impacts Caused by Significant Price Cuts

Short - term inventory clearance price cuts can quickly digest inventory, but long - term continuous discounts will have multiple negative impacts on brands, dealers, and existing car owners.

First, it damages the long - term brand value. The brand reputation once established through high - end positioning and stable premium has been continuously eroded by continuous and significant terminal discounts. The brand positioning in consumers' minds has continued to decline, and it is difficult to restore the high - end pricing system in the long run. The brand's premium ability has been permanently damaged. Early owners who bought fuel - powered vehicles at high prices have experienced a significant depreciation of their vehicles in a short period, with a strong psychological gap, and the brand's reputation and favorability have declined.

Second, dealers' operations are continuously under pressure. With long - term low - price sales, the profit per vehicle has been continuously compressed. Although the customer flow has increased slightly, the conversion rate is extremely low. Most stores can only rely on manufacturer subsidies to maintain operations, and the profit margin has continued to shrink. In the long run, there may be a contraction of stores and a weakening of after - sales support.

Third, it exacerbates the pain of industry transformation. The era when automakers relied on fuel - powered vehicle business to maintain cash flow and R & D investment is gradually coming to an end. The continuous decline in fuel - powered vehicle sales has narrowed the company's profit sources, reduced the capital buffer space for the transformation to new energy, forced the transformation rhythm to accelerate, and simultaneously increased the pressure on R & D and production capacity adjustment.

Fourth, it exacerbates consumers' wait - and - see sentiment. Regular significant discounts will make consumers form the inherent perception that "fuel - powered vehicles will only become cheaper". Even if the discounts are narrowed in the future, the market's buying willingness is difficult to recover quickly, and the demand in the fuel - powered vehicle market will continue to be sluggish.

4. Gentle Urging: How the Industry Can Smoothly Complete the Power Transformation

Electrification is an irreversible long - term industry trend, but fuel - powered vehicles still have irreplaceable value in remote areas, long - distance travel, and scenarios without charging facilities, and will not completely withdraw from the market in the short term. Automakers, dealers, and industry regulators can work together to weaken vicious price competition and achieve a smooth transition.

1. Automakers Should Reasonably Plan Inventory and Product Rhythm

For the inventory related to emission nodes, introduce hierarchical replacement subsidies and exclusive rights for old car owners to avoid a single price war. Moderately slow down the launch of new production capacity for fuel - powered vehicles, optimize the product line layout, and reduce the internal competition among homogeneous fuel - powered vehicle models. At the same time, increase the R & D and launch of hybrid vehicle models. As transitional products between fuel - powered and electric vehicles, they can take into account the convenience of energy replenishment and low usage costs, meet the needs of traditional fuel - powered vehicle users, and smooth the market switching rhythm.

Maintain stability in the pricing strategy, reduce irregular and significant terminal discounts. Offer soft policy discounts such as replacement, maintenance packages, and charging rights instead of directly lowering the bare - car transaction price to maintain the long - term brand value and reduce the depreciation gap for old car owners.

2. Dealers Should Optimize the Business Model and Weaken Price Competition

Reduce the marketing approach that simply relies on low prices to attract customers, and shift to value - added services, replacement services, and exclusive maintenance packages to attract customers. Launch upgrade and replacement policies for old fuel - powered vehicle owners to guide existing users to convert to their own new energy vehicle models, open up the customer transfer channels, activate the resources of existing users, and reduce the dependence on the retail of new fuel - powered vehicles.

Reasonably control the inventory scale, allocate vehicle sources according to demand, avoid large - scale backlog of vehicles, relieve the pressure on capital turnover, and reduce the passive situation of forced price cuts for inventory clearance.

3. Guide Consumers to Rationally View the Two Types of Power - Driven Vehicles

Objectively distinguish the applicable scenarios of the two types of vehicles and do not deliberately oppose fuel - powered and electric vehicles. For urban commuting and when there are home - charging conditions, new energy vehicles are more suitable. For frequent long - distance travel across regions and when there is no stable energy - replenishment condition, fuel - powered and hybrid vehicles are more appropriate. Consumers should make rational choices based on their own travel scenarios, budgets, and long - term vehicle usage costs. They don't need to blindly buy fuel - powered vehicles just because of short - term price cuts, nor completely deny the value of fuel - powered vehicle models.

Owners who already own fuel - powered vehicles don't need to have negative emotions because of the terminal price cuts. The core value of a vehicle lies in the years of travel service it provides, and short - term price fluctuations are a phased phenomenon of industry transformation.

4. The Industry Should Collaborate to Improve Transitional Support

Relevant parties can introduce replacement incentive policies to promote the orderly replacement of existing fuel - powered vehicles with new energy vehicles. At the same time, improve the support for hybrid vehicle models, create a transitional product track, and buffer the market fluctuations caused by the full replacement of pure - electric vehicles. Automakers should balance the allocation of R & D resources, not completely abandon the iteration of fuel - powered and hybrid technologies, and retain a diversified product matrix to cover all travel groups.

5. Conclusion

The continuous and significant decline in the terminal price of fuel - powered vehicle models is a phased industry phenomenon under the superposition of multiple factors such as the electrification wave, differences in vehicle usage costs, and inventory policies. The huge price gap of a single model intuitively shows the reshaping of the underlying logic of the automotive market. New energy vehicle models have gradually become the market mainstream due to their advantages in configuration, cost, and experience, and the decline in demand for fuel - powered vehicles has become a long - term trend.

However, market transformation does not mean a vicious price war. Although short - term inventory clearance discounts can solve the inventory problem, they will damage the brand reputation, dealers' profits, and the rights and interests of existing car owners. The industry needs a gentle and orderly transition rhythm. Automakers should optimize the product matrix and stabilize the pricing system, dealers should activate the replacement flow, and consumers should choose cars rationally according to their needs. All parties should work together to weaken the market fluctuations.

Electrification is the development direction of the era, but fuel - powered and hybrid vehicle models will still exist for a long time to meet the needs of segmented travel. The industry does not need a zero - sum competition of "opposition between fuel - powered and electric vehicles", but a transformation period of coexistence of multiple power sources and smooth and orderly development. It is hoped that major brands can balance short - term inventory digestion and long - term brand value, and use replacement, rights, and product upgrades to replace simple price cuts, so that the entire automotive industry can smoothly complete the transition period of power switching and achieve a benign connection between the old and new markets.